Export limit exceeded: 424857 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4257 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-50251 | 1 Makeplane | 1 Plane | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Server side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in makeplane plane 0.23.1 via the password recovery. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27620 | 1 Everywall | 1 Ladder | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in Ladder v.0.0.1 thru v.0.0.21 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to the API. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27707 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in hcengineering Huly Platform v.0.6.202 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via upload of crafted SVG file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27775 | 1 Sysaid | 1 Sysaid | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| SysAid before version 23.2.14 b18 - CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) may allow exposing the local OS user's NTLMv2 hash | ||||
| CVE-2025-50125 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthenticated remote code execution when the server is accessed via the network with knowledge of hidden URLs and manipulation of host request header. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29021 | 1 Judge0 | 1 Judge0 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Judge0 is an open-source online code execution system. The default configuration of Judge0 leaves the service vulnerable to a sandbox escape via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This allows an attacker with sufficient access to the Judge0 API to obtain unsandboxed code execution as root on the target machine. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25235 | 1 Omnissa | 1 Secure Email Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Omnissa Secure Email Gateway (SEG) in SEG prior to 2.32 running on Windows and SEG prior to 2503 running on UAG allows routing of network traffic such as HTTP requests to internal networks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48962 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Sensitive information disclosure due to SSRF. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Windows, Linux) before build 39938. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48383 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| Django-Select2 is a Django integration for Select2. Prior to version 8.4.1, instances of HeavySelect2Mixin subclasses like the ModelSelect2MultipleWidget and ModelSelect2Widget can leak secret access tokens across requests. This can allow users to access restricted query sets and restricted data. This issue has been patched in version 8.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33832 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| OneNav v0.9.35-20240318 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /index.php?c=api&method=get_link_info. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3448 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium |
| Users with low privileges can perform certain AJAX actions. In this vulnerability instance, improper access to ajax?action=plugin:focus:checkIframeAvailability leads to a Server-Side Request Forgery by analyzing the error messages returned from the back-end. Allowing an attacker to perform a port scan in the back-end. At the time of publication of the CVE no patch is available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34580 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Apache XML Security for C++ through 2.0.4 implements the XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification without protection against an SSRF payload in a KeyInfo element. NOTE: the project disputes this CVE Record on the grounds that any vulnerabilities are the result of a failure to configure XML Security for C++ securely. Even when avoiding this particular issue, any use of this library would need considerable additional code and a deep understanding of the standards and protocols involved to arrive at a secure implementation for any particular use case. We recommend against continued direct use of this library. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34581 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2025-44043 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Keyoti SearchUnit prior to 9.0.0. is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in /Keyoti_SearchEngine_Web_Common/SearchService.svc/GetResults and /Keyoti_SearchEngine_Web_Common/SearchService.svc/GetLocationAndContentCategories. An attacker can specify their own SMB server as the indexDirectory value when making POST requests to the affected components. In doing so an attacker can get the SearchUnit server to read and write configuration and log files from/to the attackers server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40595 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. By using an encoded URL, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37359 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. (CWE-918) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not validate the Host header of incoming HTTP/HTTPS requests. By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40441 | 1 Doccano | 2 Auto Labeling Pipeline, Doccano | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium |
| An issue in Doccano Open source annotation tools for machine learning practitioners v.1.8.4 and Doccano Auto Labeling Pipeline module to annotate a document automatically v.0.1.23 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the model_attribs parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41664 | 1 Thinkst | 1 Canarytokens | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. If a webhook is supplied when a Canarytoken is first created, the site will make a test request to the supplied URL to ensure it accepts alert notification HTTP requests. No safety checks were performed on the URL, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. The SSRF is Blind because the content of the response is not displayed to the creating user; they are simply told whether an error occurred in making the test request. Using the Blind SSRF, it was possible to map out open ports for IPs inside the Canarytokens.org infrastructure. This issue is now patched on Canarytokens.org. Users of self-hosted Canarytokens installations can update by pulling the latest Docker image, or any Docker image after `sha-097d91a`. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41668 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. When running a publicly exposed proxy endpoint without authentication, cBioPortal could allow someone to perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. Logged in users could do the same on private instances. A fix has been released in version 6.0.12. As a workaround, one might be able to disable `/proxy` endpoint entirely via, for example, nginx. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4789 | 2 Stylemixthemes, Wordpress | 2 Cost Calculator Builder Pro, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| Cost Calculator Builder Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to 3.1.72, via the send_demo_webhook() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||