Search Results (11117 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-11206 1 Tecno 1 Com.transsion.phoenix 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Unauthorized access vulnerability in the mobile application (com.transsion.phoenix) can lead to the leakage of user information.
CVE-2024-11136 2026-04-15 N/A
The default TCL Camera application exposes a provider vulnerable to path traversal vulnerability. Malicious application can supply malicious URI path and delete arbitrary files from user’s external storage.
CVE-2024-11118 1 Bilbud 1 404 Error Monitor 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
The 404 Error Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the updatePluginSettings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make changes to plugin settings and clear up all the error logs via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-11071 2026-04-15 8.8 High
Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor.
CVE-2025-59845 1 Apollographql 2 Apollo Explorer, Apollo Sandbox 2026-04-15 8.2 High
Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.
CVE-2024-11014 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NEC Corporation UNIVERGE IX from Ver9.2 to Ver10.10.21, for Ver10.8 up to Ver10.8.27 and for Ver10.9 up to Ver10.9.14 allows a attacker to hijack the authentication of screens on the device via the management interface.
CVE-2024-0892 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The Schema App Structured Data plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the MarkUpdate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update and delete post metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2023-7273 1 Kiteworks 1 Owncloud 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
Cross site request forgery in Kiteworks OwnCloud allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge requests. If a request has no Authorization header, it is created with an empty string as value by a rewrite rule. The CSRF check is done by comparing the header value to null, meaning that the existing CSRF check is bypassed in this case. An attacker can, for example, create a new administrator account if the request is executed in the browser of an authenticated victim.
CVE-2024-0847 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The 5280 Bootstrap Modal Contact Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in class-sbmm-list-table.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk delete messages via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-66004 1 Libimobiledevice 1 Libusbmuxd 2026-04-15 5.7 Medium
A Path Traversal vulnerability in usbmuxd allows local users to escalate to the service user.This issue affects usbmuxd: before 3ded00c9985a5108cfc7591a309f9a23d57a8cba.
CVE-2019-25359 1 Sitzungsdienst 1 Sd.net Rim 2026-04-15 8.2 High
SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through POST parameters 'idtyp' and 'idgremium'. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formed POST requests to the /vorlagen/ endpoint, enabling unauthorized database manipulation and potential information disclosure.
CVE-2019-25313 2 Flexera, Flexerasoftware 2 Flexnet Publisher, Flexnet Publisher 2026-04-15 4 Medium
FlexNet Publisher 11.12.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to trick authenticated users into submitting a request that creates a new local admin account with a predefined password.
CVE-2019-25259 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Leica Geosystems GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 4.30.063 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can trick logged-in users into executing unauthorized actions by crafting malicious web pages that submit requests to the application.
CVE-2019-20460 1 Epson 1 Xp-255 2026-04-15 8.8 High
An issue was discovered on Epson Expression Home XP255 20.08.FM10I8 devices. POST requests don't require (anti-)CSRF tokens or other mechanisms for validating that the request is from a legitimate source. In addition, CSRF attacks can be used to send text directly to the RAW printer interface. For example, an attack could deliver a worrisome printout to an end user.
CVE-2019-25250 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Devolo dLAN 500 AV Wireless+ 3.1.0-1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that trigger unauthorized configuration changes by exploiting predictable URL actions when a logged-in user visits the site.
CVE-2019-25247 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Beward N100 H.264 VGA IP Camera M2.1.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add an admin user by tricking a logged-in user into submitting the form.
CVE-2024-13216 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The HT Event – WordPress Event Manager Plugin for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.7 via the 'render' function in /includes/widgets/htevent_sponsor.php. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to extract sensitive private, pending, scheduled, and draft template data.
CVE-2023-7065 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
The Stop Spammers Security | Block Spam Users, Comments, Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2024.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sfs_process AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary IPs to the plugin's allowlist and blocklist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-39163 2026-04-15 8.8 High
binux pyspider up to v0.3.10 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Flask endpoints.
CVE-2023-26248 1 Kademila 1 Dht 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
The Kademlia DHT (go-libp2p-kad-dht 0.20.0 and earlier) used in IPFS (0.18.1 and earlier) assigns routing information for content (i.e., information about who holds the content) to be stored by peers whose peer IDs have a small DHT distance from the content ID. This allows an attacker to censor content by generating many Sybil peers whose peer IDs have a small distance from the content ID, thus hijacking the content resolution process.