| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0, a stack-based out-of-bounds write exists in the Notification Class object implementation when handling AddListElement for the recipient-list property. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4, 1.5.1, and 1.6.0. |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. In versions 1.5.0 and 1.6.0-rc1, there is a restore logic flaw in bacnet-stack that is reachable through the official, unmodified apps/server management path when BACNET_BACKUP_RESTORE is enabled. This issue has been patched in versions 1.5.1 and 1.6.0. |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1, a remote attacker can trigger an uncontrolled recursion and stack overflow in the default server application of bacnet-stack by abusing the Channel object. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1. |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1, there is a client-side out-of-bounds read in the AtomicReadFile-ACK record-access handling path. The issue is caused by a mismatch between a remote returnedRecordCount value and the fixed local fileData[] array capacity in BACNET_ATOMIC_READ_FILE_DATA. The ACK decode path preserves the remote RecordCount, discards storage for excess records without truncating that count, and a downstream sink later iterates over the original RecordCount and indexes fileData[i] out of bounds. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1. |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. From versions 1.4.0 to before 1.4.4, and 1.5.0 to before 1.5.1, an uninitialized value use vulnerability in bacnet-stack's AtomicReadFile record-access ACK encoder allows unauthenticated remote attackers to corrupt the encoded OCTET STRING length and payload boundary in network responses by sending a crafted AtomicReadFile request that reaches a successful record-access path. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: fcoe: Reject FIP descriptors with zero fip_dlen in CVL walker
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c::fcoe_ctlr_recv_clr_vlink() advanced the
descriptor cursor by an attacker-supplied fip_dlen without ever
requiring dlen >= sizeof(struct fip_desc) in the default branch. The
named descriptor cases (FIP_DT_MAC, FIP_DT_NAME, FIP_DT_VN_ID) checked
their per-type minimum lengths, but a FIP_DT_NON_CRITICAL descriptor
(fip_dtype >= 128, which the standard requires receivers to silently
ignore) skipped that check entirely.
An unauthenticated L2 peer on the FCoE control VLAN could hang
fcoe_ctlr_recv_work on an fcoe, qedf, or bnx2fc initiator indefinitely
by emitting one FIP CVL frame whose single descriptor had fip_dtype ==
FIP_DT_NON_CRITICAL and fip_dlen == 0: the cursor advanced zero bytes
per iteration and the loop condition rlen >= sizeof(*desc) stayed true
forever, blocking every subsequent FIP frame on that controller.
Tighten the outer dlen guard to also reject dlen < sizeof(struct
fip_desc), so a malformed descriptor whose length cannot even cover the
descriptor header is rejected before the switch. This is the same
lower-bound the named cases already apply and is the minimum scope that
closes the loop. |
| BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. Prior to versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1, an out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in bacnet-stack's AtomicWriteFile record-access path. The bug is caused by a mismatch between an externally controlled returnedRecordCount field and the fixed-size internal fileData[] array used by BACNET_ATOMIC_WRITE_FILE_DATA. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.4 and 1.5.1. |
| A vulnerability was found in Governikus AusweisApp Mobile up to 2.5.5. This impacts an unknown function of the component StartPAOSResponse Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ResultMessage results in cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.6.0 will fix this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised. This CVE was requested by the vendor. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: qcom_geni: fix kfifo underflow when flush precedes DMA completion IRQ
When uart_flush_buffer() runs before the DMA completion IRQ is delivered,
the following race can occur (all steps serialized by uart_port_lock):
1. DMA starts: tx_remaining = N, kfifo contains N bytes
2. DMA completes in hardware; IRQ is pending but not yet delivered
3. uart_flush_buffer() acquires the port lock and calls kfifo_reset(),
making kfifo_len() = 0 while tx_remaining remains N
4. uart_flush_buffer() releases the port lock
5. DMA IRQ fires; handle_tx_dma() acquires the port lock and calls
uart_xmit_advance(uport, tx_remaining) on an empty kfifo
uart_xmit_advance() increments kfifo->out by tx_remaining. Since
kfifo_reset() already set both in and out to 0, out wraps past in,
causing kfifo_len() to return UART_XMIT_SIZE - tx_remaining. The next
start_tx_dma() call then submits a DMA transfer of stale buffer data.
Fix this by snapshotting kfifo_len() at the start of handle_tx_dma()
and skipping uart_xmit_advance() when fifo_len < tx_remaining, which
indicates the kfifo was reset by a preceding flush. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In createIntent of TimerAgent.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In aoc_unlocked_ioctl_handle_ion_fd of aoc.c, there is a possible type confusion due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In ac_get_prot_config of plat_trusty.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In HostLinkBase::chreIpiHandler of host_link.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple functions of simd_ctx.c, there is a possible way to disclose secure vector predicate and fault registers to non-secure callers due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
