Search Results (24421 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-116785 2 Freeswitch, Signalwire 2 Freeswitch, Freeswitch 2026-11-10 9.1 Critical
FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.2, ws_read_frame() decoded a WebSocket frame's 64-bit extended payload length with a 32-bit byte swap and narrowed the result into a signed length. A value whose surviving low word became negative bypassed the signed size check and was reinterpreted as an enormous unsigned count, causing client bytes to overwrite memory beyond the 64 KiB receive buffer. Any client completing a /socket WebSocket upgrade on an enabled mod_xml_rpc endpoint reached the parser before HTTP authentication; both the module and WebSocket endpoint are disabled by default. The heap overwrite can corrupt connection pointers and crash FreeSWITCH, ending every concurrent session, although remote code execution has not been demonstrated. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.2.
CVE-2026-116787 2 Freeswitch, Signalwire 2 Freeswitch, Freeswitch 2026-11-10 7.5 High
FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.2, mod_event_socket used an unauthenticated Content-Length value directly as the allocation size for an Event Socket message body. Negative or extremely large values could overflow the terminator calculation or force an allocation failure through a helper that aborts the FreeSWITCH process. The header is parsed before the Event Socket password, so any host admitted by apply-inbound-acl can trigger termination with its first packet; the default loopback ACL limits ordinary installations to local clients. The outbound socket dialplan path is also affected when FreeSWITCH connects to a hostile application server, and process termination drops every active call until the service is restarted. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.2.
CVE-2026-14968 2026-11-10 N/A
EDK2 contains vulnerabilities in BIOS where skilled and privileged users or attackers may cause “Out-of-bounds Write” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could compromise SMM handler integrity, cause system instability, and lead to denial of service. It could also impact Integrity and Availability.
CVE-2026-119958 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 9.8 Critical
Out-of-bounds write in Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-119906 1 Microsoft 1 Windows Sandbox 2026-11-10 7.8 High
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Windows Sandbox allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-122988 1 Microsoft 1 Windows Admin Center 2026-11-10 8 High
Improper authorization in Windows Admin Center allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
CVE-2026-116928 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 9.8 Critical
Out-of-bounds write in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-99285 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-11-10 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_byteorder: remove multi-register support 64bit byteorder conversion is broken when several registers need to be converted because the source register array advances in steps for 4 bytes instead of 8: for (i = ... src64 = nft_reg_load64(&src[i]); ~~~~~ u32 *src nft_reg_store64(&dst64[i], Remove the multi-register support, it has other issues as well: Pablo points out that commit caf3ef7468f7 ("netfilter: nf_tables: prevent OOB access in nft_byteorder_eval") alters semantics: before the loop operated on registers, i.e. for ( ... ) dst32[i] = htons((u16)src32[i]) .. but after the patch it will operate on bytes, which makes this useless to convert e.g. concatenations, which store each compound in its own register. Multi-convert of u32 has one theoretical application: ct mark . meta mark . tcp dport @intervalset Because ct mark and meta mark are host byte order, use with intervals has to convert the byteorder for ct/meta mark value to network byte order (bigendian). nftables emits this: [ meta load mark => reg 1 ] [ byteorder reg 1 = hton(reg 1, 4, 4) ] [ ct load mark => reg 9 ] [ byteorder reg 9 = hton(reg 9, 4, 4) ] ... I.e. two separate calls. Theoretically it could be changed to do: [ meta load mark => reg 1 ] [ ct load mark => reg 9 ] [ byteorder reg 1 = htonl(reg 1, 4, 8) ] ... But then all it would take to change the set to meta mark . tcp dport . ct mark ... and we'd be back to two "byteorder" calls. IOW, support to convert a range of registers is both dysfunctional and dubious. Simplify this: remove the feature. Pablo Neira Ayuso points out that nftables before 1.1.0 can generate incorrect byteorder conversions, see 9fe58952c45a, "evaluate: skip byteorder conversion for selector smaller than 2 bytes" in nftables.git). Affected rulesets fail to load with this change and old userspace due to 'len != size' check.
CVE-2026-96020 1 Microsoft 4 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 1 more 2026-11-10 8.8 High
Out-of-bounds write in DNS Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-96981 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 6.4 Medium
Out-of-bounds write in Windows PCI Bus Driver allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.
CVE-2026-96031 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 7.8 High
Out-of-bounds write in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-109457 1 Microsoft 1 Azure Machine Learning 2026-11-10 8 High
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Azure CLI allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-99273 1 Linux 2 Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-11-10 6.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: reserve space for the UTF-16 terminator in stream info smb_strtoUTF16() always writes a terminating zero UTF-16 unit after the converted characters, but get_file_stream_info() budgets only sizeof(struct smb2_file_stream_info) + streamlen * 2 for a stream entry and sizeof(struct smb2_file_stream_info) + 7 * 2 for the trailing "::$DATA" entry. When an entry exactly fills the 448-byte small response buffer, the terminator is written two bytes past the allocation. Reserve one extra UTF-16 unit in both budget checks. The terminator is not part of the wire format, so the reported lengths are unchanged.
CVE-2026-99109 1 Linux 2 Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-11-10 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: reject SetEA requests that do not fit the request buffer CIFSSMBSetEA() copies the caller's extended attribute value into the SMB request buffer without checking that it fits. The requirement is stated in the source but was never implemented: /*BB add length check to see if it would fit in negotiated SMB buffer size BB */ /* if (ea_value_len > buffer_size - 512 (enough for header)) */ if (ea_value_len) memcpy(parm_data->list.name + name_len + 1, ea_value, ea_value_len); The only bound applied on the way in is in cifs_xattr_set(): #define MAX_EA_VALUE_SIZE CIFSMaxBufSize ... if (size > MAX_EA_VALUE_SIZE) CIFSMaxBufSize is the full payload capacity of the buffer, so a value of exactly that size leaves no room for the SMB header, the TRANS2 parameter block, the fealist header and the EA name that are written ahead of it in the same object. SendReceive() already enforces the correct limit on this very length: if (in_len > CIFSMaxBufSize + MAX_CIFS_HDR_SIZE) but it is called after the copy has taken place. An unprivileged setxattr(2) on an SMB1 mount with a 250-byte name and a 16384-byte value writes 16384 bytes starting 345 bytes into a 16588-byte cifs_request object, ending 141 bytes past it: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in CIFSSMBSetEA+0xabc/0xde0 Write of size 16384 at addr ffff888003aa0159 by task init/68 __asan_memcpy+0x3c/0x60 CIFSSMBSetEA+0xabc/0xde0 cifs_xattr_set+0xd3a/0xff0 __vfs_setxattr+0x13e/0x1a0 The buggy address is located 345 bytes inside of allocated 16588-byte region Apply SendReceive()'s limit to the assembled request before the copy rather than after it, and widen the byte counters so the sum cannot wrap before it is tested. byte_count is also tested against U16_MAX, because it is stored in the 16-bit pSMB->ByteCount. That becomes reachable when CIFSMaxBufSize is raised at module load, where it may be set as high as 1024*127: with a 5-byte EA name and a 65521-byte value, count is exactly U16_MAX while byte_count is 65556, and cpu_to_le16() would truncate it to 20 and transmit a frame whose ByteCount does not match its length. Testing byte_count covers count as well, since byte_count is the larger of the two and count's only 16-bit consumer is written after this point. check_add_overflow() is evaluated first so that total_len is assigned before it is reported.
CVE-2026-102224 1 Microsoft 1 Azure Cyclecloud 2026-11-10 8.4 High
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Azure CycleCloud allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
CVE-2026-58879 1 Google 1 Android 2026-11-10 8.4 High
In descramble of multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper casting. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2026-15035 1 Bentoml 1 Openllm 2026-11-10 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in bentoml OpenLLM 0.6.30. This affects the function async_run_command of the file src/openllm/common.py of the component Model Repository Directory Name Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument cmd results in command injection. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-57891 2026-11-10 N/A
Out-of-bounds write in the XmlCliCommonDxe for the Intel(R) Server Board D50DNP and Intel(R) Server Board M50FCP within Ring 0 UEFI may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts.
CVE-2026-57882 2026-11-10 N/A
Out-of-bounds write in the XmlCliCommonDxe for the Intel(R) Server Board D50DNP and Intel(R) Server Board M50FCP within Ring 0 UEFI may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts.
CVE-2026-56435 2026-11-10 N/A
Out-of-bounds write in the XmlCliCommonDxe for the Intel(R) Server Board D50DNP and Intel(R) Server Board M50FCP within Ring 0 UEFI may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts.