Export limit exceeded: 424760 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424760 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424760 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (6112 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-14899 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2026-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| The code to parse MIME headers for display when forwarding a message (if the setting to view all headers was enabled) had an off-by-one error, allowing a single byte to be read from the memory after the buffer for the headers, and potentially crashing Thunderbird. This vulnerability was fixed in Thunderbird 153 and Thunderbird 140.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20025 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 6.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF link-state update (LSU) packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF LSU packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2019-12678 | 1 Cisco | 13 Adaptive Security Appliance, Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Asa 5505 and 10 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) inspection module of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper parsing of SIP messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious SIP packet through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to trigger an integer underflow, causing the software to try to read unmapped memory and resulting in a crash. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20685 | 1 Cisco | 3 Cyber Vision, Secure Firewall Threat Defense, Unified Threat Defense Snort Intrusion Prevention System Engine | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the Modbus preprocessor of the Snort detection engine could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to an integer overflow while processing Modbus traffic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted Modbus traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the Snort process to hang, causing traffic inspection to stop.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51536 | 2 Eipstackgroup, Opener Project | 2 Opener, Opener | 2026-08-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| In OpENer 2.3.0 (commit 76b95cf) when parsing incoming CIP (Common Industrial Protocol) network packets, the length parameter is inconsistently typed across the call stack. Specifically, an upstream length calculated as an int is passed to a downstream function that expects an EipInt16 (a 16-bit signed integer). If a maliciously crafted packet with specific length fields is processed, the length parameter can overflow or be truncated into a negative value. This negative length bypasses subsequent bounds checking (due to signed/unsigned comparison issues) and is ultimately used in memory operations, leading to a Stack Buffer Overflow when reading data in DecodePaddedEPath. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51540 | 2 Eipstackgroup, Opener Project | 2 Opener, Opener | 2026-08-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| OpENer 2.3.0 (master branch up to commit 76b95cf) is vulnerable to a severe memory corruption issue caused by an integer underflow in the processing of connected explicit messages (SendUnitData). | ||||
| CVE-2026-64089 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: tt: fix negative last_changeset_len batadv_piv_tt::last_changeset_len len was declared as s16, but the field is never intended to hold a negative value. When a value greater than 32767 is assigned, it wraps to a negative signed integer. In batadv_send_my_tt_response(), last_changeset_len is temporarily widened to s32. The incorrectly negative s16 value propagates into the s32, causing batadv_tt_prepare_tvlv_local_data() to allocate a full sized buffer but populates only a small portion of it with the collected changeset. All remaining bits are kept uninitialized. Using an u16 avoids this type confusion and ensures that no (negative) sign extension is performed in batadv_send_my_tt_response(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-68270 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/sysfb: Avoid possible truncation with calculating visible size Calculating the visible size of the system framebuffer can result in truncation of the result. The calculation uses 32-bit arithmetics, which can overflow if the values for height and stride are large. Fix the issue by multiplying with mul_u32_u32(). | ||||
| CVE-2024-21391 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21377 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 17 more | 2026-08-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows DNS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-34513 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 5 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-34512 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 8 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21420 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-34510 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21379 | 1 Microsoft | 4 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel and 1 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-35372 | 1 Microsoft | 6 365 Apps, Office, Office 2019 and 3 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21372 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21352 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21350 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-35385 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 16 more | 2026-08-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||