Export limit exceeded: 425066 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425066 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11746 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11746 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-2521 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| The Honeywell Experion PKS and OneWireless WDM contains a Memory Buffer vulnerability in the component Control Data Access (CDA). An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to an Overread Buffers, which could result in improper index validation against buffer borders leading to remote code execution. Honeywell recommends updating to the most recent version of Honeywell Experion PKS: 520.2 TCU9 HF1 and 530.1 TCU3 HF1 and OneWireless: 322.5 and 331.1. The affected Experion PKS products are C300 PCNT02, C300 PCNT05, FIM4, FIM8, UOC, CN100, HCA, C300PM, and C200E. The Experion PKS versions affected are from 520.1 through 520.2 TCU9 and from 530 through 530 TCU3.The OneWireless WDM affected versions are 322.1 through 322.4 and 330.1 through 330.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24494 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| Path traversal may allow remote code execution using privileged account (requires device admin account, cannot be performed by a regular user). In combination with the 'Upload' functionality this could be used to execute an arbitrary script or possibly an uploaded binary. Remediation in Version 6.7.0, release date: 20-Oct-24. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24480 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A Remote Code Execution Vulnerability exists in the product and version listed above. The vulnerability is due to lack of input sanitation and could allow a remote attacker to run commands or code as a high privileged user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23217 | 1 Mitmproxy | 1 Mitmproxy | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| mitmproxy is a interactive TLS-capable intercepting HTTP proxy for penetration testers and software developers and mitmweb is a web-based interface for mitmproxy. In mitmweb 11.1.1 and below, a malicious client can use mitmweb's proxy server (bound to `*:8080` by default) to access mitmweb's internal API (bound to `127.0.0.1:8081` by default). In other words, while the cannot access the API directly, they can access the API through the proxy. An attacker may be able to escalate this SSRF-style access to remote code execution. The mitmproxy and mitmdump tools are unaffected. Only mitmweb is affected. This vulnerability has been fixed in mitmproxy 11.1.2 and above. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11538 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in Keycloak's server distribution where enabling debug mode (--debug <port>) insecurely defaults to binding the Java Debug Wire Protocol (JDWP) port to all network interfaces (0.0.0.0). This exposes the debug port to the local network, allowing an attacker on the same network segment to attach a remote debugger and achieve remote code execution within the Keycloak Java virtual machine. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2912 | 1 Bentoml | 1 Bentoml | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| An insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in the BentoML framework, allowing remote code execution (RCE) by sending a specially crafted POST request. By exploiting this vulnerability, attackers can execute arbitrary commands on the server hosting the BentoML application. The vulnerability is triggered when a serialized object, crafted to execute OS commands upon deserialization, is sent to any valid BentoML endpoint. This issue poses a significant security risk, enabling attackers to compromise the server and potentially gain unauthorized access or control. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23123 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the management network could execute a remote code execution (RCE) by exploiting a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the UniFi Protect Cameras (Version 4.75.43 and earlier) firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23119 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An Improper Neutralization of Escape Sequences vulnerability could allow an Authentication Bypass with a Remote Code Execution (RCE) by a malicious actor with access to UniFi Protect Cameras adjacent network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11539 | 1 Grafana | 2 Grafana, Grafana-image-renderer | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| Grafana Image Renderer is vulnerable to remote code execution due to an arbitrary file write vulnerability. This is due to the fact that the /render/csv endpoint lacked validation of the filePath parameter that allowed an attacker to save a shared object to an arbitrary location that is then loaded by the Chromium process. Instances are vulnerable if: 1. The default token ("authToken") is not changed, or is known to the attacker. 2. The attacker can reach the image renderer endpoint. This issue affects grafana-image-renderer: from 1.0.0 through 4.0.16. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23115 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A Use After Free vulnerability on UniFi Protect Cameras could allow a Remote Code Execution (RCE) by a malicious actor with access to UniFi Protect Cameras management network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22962 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of GatesAir Maxiva UAXT, VAXT transmitters when debugging mode is enabled. An attacker with a valid session ID (sess_id) can send specially crafted POST requests to the /json endpoint, enabling arbitrary command execution on the underlying system. This vulnerability can lead to full system compromise, including unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and potentially full device takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11548 | 1 Ibi | 1 Webfocus Business Intelligence | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A remote, unauthenticated privilege escalation in ibi WebFOCUS allows an attacker to gain administrative access to the application which may lead to unauthenticated Remote Code Execution | ||||
| CVE-2025-12048 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Scanner Pro | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Scanner Pro client during an internal security assessment that could allow remote code execution or unauthorized control of the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12089 | 2 Supsystic, Wordpress | 2 Data Tables Generator, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Data Tables Generator by Supsystic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the cleanCache() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.45. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). | ||||
| CVE-2025-12138 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The URL Image Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to insufficient file type validation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to the plugin relying on a user-controlled Content-Type HTTP header to validate file uploads in the 'uimptr_import_image_from_url()' function which writes the file to the server before performing proper validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible via the uploaded PHP file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12171 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The RESTful Content Syndication plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the ingest_image() function in versions 1.1.0 to 1.5.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. This requires the attacker have access to a defined third-party server as specified in the settings, so it is unlikely that this will be exploitable by contributor-level users, and more likely to be exploited by administrators who also have access to the plugin's settings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12486 | 1 Heimdalldata | 1 Database Proxy | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Heimdall Data Database Proxy Cross-Site Scripting Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Heimdall Data Database Proxy. Minimal user interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the database event logs. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can lead to the injection of arbitrary script. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to interact with the application in the context of the target user. Was ZDI-CAN-24755. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12490 | 1 Netgate | 1 Pfsense | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Netgate pfSense CE Suricata Path Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create arbitrary files on affected installations of Netgate pfSense. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the Suricata package. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to create files in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-28085. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48956 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Serviceware Processes 6.0 through 7.3 before 7.4 allows attackers without valid authentication to send a specially crafted HTTP request to a service endpoint resulting in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48871 | 1 Planet Technology Corp | 1 Wgs-804hpt Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The affected product is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. An unauthenticated attacker could send a malicious HTTP request that the webserver fails to properly check input size before copying data to the stack, potentially allowing remote code execution. | ||||