Export limit exceeded: 425461 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (425461 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-58681 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58684 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In smmu_config_l3tt of smmu.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58801 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In smmu_domain_config_s1 of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible way to access stale stream table entries across reassigned stream identifiers due to a logic error. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58803 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In bytes_are_equal of lib.rs, there is a possible way to recover authentication keys due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58806 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In get_sswrp_state of cpm_mbox_srv/main.c, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58808 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to dump secure cache lines into non-secure memory on warm reset due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58809 | 2026-11-12 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In smmu_domain_config_s1 of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible OOB Write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65951 | 2026-11-12 | 5.8 Medium | ||
| A path traversal vulnerability in the TAR.GZ extraction logic of Lenovo XClarity Essentials OneCLI 5.5.0 for Linux could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files with the privileges of the OneCLI process by convincing a user to process a specially crafted TAR.GZ update package. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122162 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 7 more | 2026-11-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows Update Stack allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122172 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Trace Data Helper allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122183 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122297 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| Use of uninitialized resource in Kernel Transaction Manager allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118704 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 8 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118714 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 8 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64564 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing sctp_process_asconf() caches the transport the ASCONF chunk is processed against in asconf->transport (== chunk->transport, set once in sctp_rcv()). For an ASCONF located through its Address Parameter by __sctp_rcv_asconf_lookup(), that cached transport corresponds to the Address Parameter, which need not be the packet's source address. sctp_process_asconf_param() rejects a DEL-IP for the packet source address (ADDIP D8, SCTP_ERROR_DEL_SRC_IP), but nothing protects asconf->transport. A single ASCONF can therefore carry, in order: [Address Parameter L] [DEL-IP L] [DEL-IP 0.0.0.0] where L differs from the source. The DEL-IP for L passes the D8 check and calls sctp_assoc_rm_peer() on the transport that asconf->transport still points at, freeing it (RCU-deferred). The following wildcard DEL-IP then reuses the now-dangling asconf->transport in sctp_assoc_set_primary() and sctp_assoc_del_nonprimary_peers(): set_primary() dereferences the freed transport (->ipaddr, ->state) and plants the dangling pointer into asoc->peer.primary_path / active_path, and del_nonprimary_peers(), keeping only the pointer that is no longer on the list, removes every real transport, leaving the association with a transport_count of 0 and primary_path/active_path pointing at freed memory. Reject a DEL-IP that targets the transport the ASCONF is being processed against, mirroring the existing source-address guard, so the wildcard branch can never reuse a freed transport. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93902 | 2 Pencidesign, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Soledad, Soledad | 2026-11-12 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Soledad theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Social Profile Fields in all versions up to, and including, 8.7.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The injected payload is scoped to the attacker's own user meta but is exposed publicly on their author archive page at /author/<slug>/, which is accessible to unauthenticated visitors regardless of whether the attacker has published any posts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120477 | 2 Webguyio, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Stop Spammers Classic, Stop Spammers Classic | 2026-11-12 | 4.7 Medium |
| The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'author' POST parameter in versions up to, and including, 2026.6. An unauthenticated POST handled on init stores the attacker-supplied author field (after sanitize_text_field, which does not escape single quotes) into the ss_stop_sp_reg_stats option history. The Log Report admin page then renders that stored value inside a single-quoted JavaScript string within a double-quoted onclick attribute using esc_js(); because esc_js() uses _wp_specialchars with ENT_COMPAT it does not escape single quotes, allowing the stored value to break out of the JS string literal and inject arbitrary JavaScript. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute whenever an administrator with manage_options access clicks the 'Report to SFS' link on an attacker-poisoned log row (the StopForumSpam API key must be configured for that link to be rendered — the field is empty by default). Successful exploitation additionally requires an action by an administrator — the attacker cannot trigger the vulnerability on their own. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97190 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Advanced Custom Fields | 2026-11-12 | 2.7 Low |
| The Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) WordPress plugin before 6.8.11 does not verify that a user is allowed to edit the target object before writing to it during bidirectional relationship synchronization, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to add or remove a reference to their own object on arbitrary posts, users, or terms they cannot otherwise edit. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97191 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Advanced Custom Fields | 2026-11-12 | 2.7 Low |
| The Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) WordPress plugin before 6.8.11 does not re-apply its field-group location rules when persisting values submitted through the post editor save path, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to write custom fields the site restricted to administrators onto their own posts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15708 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Live Composer | 2026-11-12 | 3.5 Low |
| The Live Composer WordPress plugin before 2.1.23 does not sanitise and escape some of its custom post type slug settings before using them in front-end links, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in a multisite setup). | ||||