Export limit exceeded: 425070 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425070 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (425070 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126158 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands as root via specially crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126153 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126151 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| A incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain elevation of privilege (account takeover) via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126152 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.6 High |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to delete arbitrary directories as root, or to access or delete other users' calendar and mailbox data across tenant domains, via crafted HTTP requests to the webmail and administrative interfaces. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126156 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 9.1 Critical |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to take over an arbitrary IBE recipient account via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126147 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126159 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to release or delete quarantined messages for arbitrary mailboxes via a crafted quarantine release request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126160 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 8.2 High |
| A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to escalate privileges and release or delete quarantined messages for arbitrary mailboxes via a crafted quarantine release requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126164 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 9.4 Critical |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118102 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 For X64-based Systems \(cu31\), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 For X64-based Systems \(cu32\), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 For X64-based Systems \(cu27\) and 6 more | 2026-11-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| Use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118292 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 8 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121367 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-11-12 | 9.6 Critical |
| On affected Arista EOS platforms with Routing Information Protocol version 2 (RIPv2) configured, under certain conditions, RIPv2 might be silently enabled on management interfaces even when the RIP agent intends to disable it. It allows an unauthenticated attacker with access to the adjacent network to send crafted RIPv2 route advertisements to the device's management IP address. The device could accept and install those routes without authentication. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to redirect traffic flows to an attacker-controlled destination, install more-specific routes that blackhole legitimate traffic, or otherwise disrupt network reachability for systems whose traffic passes through the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121368 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-11-12 | 8.6 High |
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) configured to use keyed MD5 or keyed SHA1 authentication, an unauthenticated attacker with network adjacency (direct or multi-hop) to a BFD-enabled interface can send a specially crafted BFD packet resulting in a system reboot. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108536 | 1 Ibm | 2 Agentics, Db2 Genius Hub | 2026-11-12 | 4.6 Medium |
| IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101542 | 1 Oracle | 2 Capacity, E-business Suite | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Capacity product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Capacity. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Capacity. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101543 | 1 Oracle | 2 Capacity, E-business Suite | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Capacity product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Capacity. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Capacity. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101541 | 1 Oracle | 2 Capacity, E-business Suite | 2026-11-12 | 7.7 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Capacity product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Capacity. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Capacity, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Capacity accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-70642 | 2026-11-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| ToolJet before 3.21.94, fixed in commit e5f387a, contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the app environments init endpoint that allows authenticated users to read app version metadata belonging to other workspaces. Attackers can send GET requests to /api/app-environments/init with an editing_version_id from another workspace to retrieve the version name, description, status, current environment ID, and app ID, because the lookup is not scoped to the caller's organization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101540 | 1 Oracle | 2 Capacity, E-business Suite | 2026-11-12 | 7.7 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Capacity product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Capacity. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Capacity, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Capacity accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-108588 | 1 Ibm | 2 Agentics, Db2 Genius Hub | 2026-11-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a missing X-Content-Type-Options header allowing MIME type sniffing. | ||||