Export limit exceeded: 11102 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11102 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-89320 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Keypont-gose | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| `HmacShaCryptor.Hash` never hashed its input. For any input it returned `HMAC_K("")` — the MAC of the empty message under the key. Every AES-CBC-HMAC JWE produced or verified by gose therefore carried an authentication tag that is constant per key and independent of the message, removing ciphertext integrity entirely. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77157 | 1 Checkmarx | 1 Ast-cli | 2026-11-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| ast-cli downloads two helper binaries, the Vorpal ASCA real-time engine and the SCA Resolver, from "download.checkmarx.com" as part of its auto-update flow, triggered by the Checkmarx’s "VSCode/JetBrains" extensions and by cx scan "sca-realtime". Prior to the fix, the downloaded archive was not verified against a checksum before extraction and execution. An attacker able to substitute the served archive could deliver an arbitrary binary that ast-cli would extract and execute the contents of the archive, since no integrity check was performed on the download. Successful exploitation requires compromising "download.checkmarx.com" and replacing the served archive with one containing an attacker-controlled binary. If the served archive had been replaced that way, any developer machine or CI pipeline invoking ASCA (via Checkmarx's VSCode/JetBrains extensions) or cx scan "sca-realtime" on an affected version would have extracted and executed that binary in place of the intended download. The download is now verified against a published SHA-256 checksum before extraction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75779 | 1 Asus | 1 Router | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (“OS Command Injection”) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in an ASUS router model allow an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a phishing website, causing the router to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116880 | 1 Semantic-mediawiki | 1 Semantic Mediawiki | 2026-10-31 | 7.1 High |
| Semantic MediaWiki from 3.0.0 before 7.3.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Special:SMWAdmin because it overwrites the wpEditToken with a freshly generated valid token. Attackers can lure an authenticated smw-admin user to a malicious page that triggers schema setup, entity-disposal, or job actions, causing semantic data loss and resource exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116210 | 1 Webasyst | 1 Webasyst-framework | 2026-10-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Webasyst Framework through 4.4.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the Photos app that allows remote attackers to perform backend actions because the app does not enable the framework's opt-in CSRF check. Attackers can lure logged-in Photos users to a malicious page that submits forged POST requests to photo/delete, album/save, photo/manageAccessSave or photo/saveField, deleting photos and changing access rights. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115906 | 1 Zip-rs | 1 Zip2 | 2026-10-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| zip is a zip library for Rust that supports reading and writing simple ZIP files. From 0.6.0 until 9.0.0, the AES entry reader in src/aes.rs verifies its HMAC only when the attacker-controlled data counter reaches zero. If the underlying bounded reader reaches the real end of the archive while data_remaining is still positive, or if an encrypted entry has no payload, the reader can return a clean end of stream without reading and comparing the authentication tag. Applications using by_index_decrypt, by_name_decrypt, by_path_decrypt, or password-enabled by_index_with_options can therefore accept modified plaintext without an authentication error. This issue is fixed in version 9.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115299 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Contact Form By Supsystic | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1 does not verify a CSRF nonce before saving its mail settings, allowing an attacker to overwrite the site's outbound mail configuration, including the SMTP server, its credentials and the notification recipient, by tricking a logged-in administrator into visiting a crafted page, which can route the Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1's contact-form notifications through infrastructure the attacker controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115300 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Contact Form By Supsystic | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Contact Form by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 1.11.1 does not validate a CSRF token or request origin on two administrator-only actions that bulk-delete captured form submissions and wipe a form's statistics, allowing attackers to permanently destroy a site's stored contact leads and analytics by tricking a logged-in administrator into sending a forged request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107262 | 1 Drupal | 1 Advanced Filesystem | 2026-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Filesystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Filesystem versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.28. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110983 | 2 Wordpress-extensions, Wppa | 2 Wp Photo Album Plus, Wp Photo Album Plus | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Photo Album Plus WordPress plugin before 9.3.04.004 does not verify the origin or a security token for one of its comment-management requests, allowing attackers to delete photo comments by tricking a logged-in user who holds comment-moderation rights into loading a crafted page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39734 | 2 Saad Iqbal, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp Easypay, Wp Easypay | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Path Traversal in WP EasyPay <= 4.5.4 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27062 | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPFunnels Team WPFunnels wpfunnels allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WPFunnels: from n/a through 3.13.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6017 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management through versions 2.10, before 2.10.7, 2.11, before 2.11.4, and 2.12, before 2.12.4. This vulnerability allows an unprivileged user to view confidential managed cluster credentials through the UI. This information should only be accessible to authorized users and may result in the loss of confidentiality of administrative information, which could be leaked to unauthorized actors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65566 | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Meow Apps AI Engine ai-engine allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AI Engine: from n/a through 3.8.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63913 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-30 | 8.2 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check An unintended behavior in the TCP conntrack state machine allows a connection to be forced into the CLOSE state using an RST packet with an invalid sequence number. Specifically, after a SYN packet is observed, an RST with an invalid SEQ can transition the conntrack entry to TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE, regardless of whether the RST corresponds to the expected reply direction. The relevant code path assumes the RST is a response to an outgoing SYN, but does not validate packet direction or ensure that a matching SYN was actually sent in the opposite direction. As a result, a crafted packet sequence consisting of a SYN followed by an invalid-sequence RST can prematurely terminate an active NAT entry. This makes connection teardown easier than intended. So, tighten the state transition logic to ensure that RST-triggered CLOSE transitions only occur when the RST is a valid response to a previously observed SYN in the correct direction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119466 | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPExperts APIExperts Square for WooCommerce woosquare allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects APIExperts Square for WooCommerce: from n/a through 4.7.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61671 | 1 Labredescefetrj | 1 Wegia | 2026-10-30 | 8.1 High |
| WeGIA is a web manager for charitable institutions. Prior to the advisory's stated patched version 3.8.7, the `/controle/control.php` dispatch endpoint accepts attacker-controlled `nomeClasse`, `metodo`, and record identifier parameters through `extract($_REQUEST)`, including id, `idatendido`, `idInterno`, and `id_funcionario`, while the affected Controle CRUD methods do not verify record ownership. Any authenticated user can view, modify, or delete another user's records, exposing CPF, RG, addresses, medical records, financial data, and employee records. `AtendidoControle` lacks ownership checks on alterar, excluir, `listarUm`, `alterarInfPessoal`, `alterarDocumentacao`, `alterarImagem`, `alterarEndereco`, and `alterarStatus`; `InternoControle` lacks them on incluir, alterar, excluir, `listarUm`, `listarTodos`, and `listarCpf`. `FuncionarioControle` lacks ownership checks on `alterarInfPessoal`, `alterarEndereco`, `alterarDocumentacao`, `alterarImagem`, `alterarCargaHoraria`, and excluir; `VoluntarioControle` lacks them on `alterarInfPessoal`, `alterarEndereco`, `alterarDetalhes`, `alterarImagem`, and excluir. `AtendidoControle` and `InternoControle` additionally lack CSRF validation, allowing a malicious page visited by an authenticated victim to perform state-changing operations using the victim's session. `FuncionarioControle` and `VoluntarioControle` have per-method CSRF checks, but those checks do not prevent the object-authorization bypass. The advisory identifies version 3.8.7 as patched. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45141 | 1 Chamilo | 1 Chamilo Lms | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Chamilo LMS is an open-source learning management system. Prior to 2.0.1, the `add`, `delete_gradebook_from_skill`, `save_profile`, and `delete_profile` actions in `public/main/inc/ajax/skill.ajax.php` perform database mutations without `Security::check_token()` validation. An attacker can use cross-site request forgery to cause an authenticated administrator or DRH who visits a malicious page to create, modify, or delete skill records and profiles, or remove skill-gradebook associations. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76297 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-30 | 4.2 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, an unauthenticated user could trick a user that holds a role with the edit_federated_providers capability into turning off all federated search providers. Successful exploitation could temporarily prevent federated searches from retrieving data from remote datasets. The vulnerability is possible because the federated provider Representational State Transfer (REST) API accepts GET requests for actions that change provider state. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. For more information see Run federated searches over remote Splunk platform deployments (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/federated-search/10.6/run-federated-searches-across-other-splunk-deployments/run-federated-searches-over-remote-splunk-platform-deployments) and Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72416 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-30 | 7.3 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_compat: ebtables emulation must reject non-bridge targets xtables targets return netfilter verdicts: NF_ACCEPT, NF_DROP, and so on. ebtables targets return incompatible verdicts: EBT_ACCEPT, EBT_DROP, ... We cannot allow fallback to NFPROTO_UNSPEC. ebtables doesn't permit this since 11ff7288beb2 ("netfilter: ebtables: reject non-bridge targets") but that commit missed the nft_compat layer. | ||||